Over on The Master’s Artist, Mark Bertrand discusses the responsibilities of the artist, or anyone with a platform. He leans toward letting it all hang out, writing with passion rather than allowing yourself to be self-censored. Of course, he doesn’t say we have to publish our wild-child manuscripts. Just says we should write ‘em and evaluate later to see if it would be safe to drive them on public roadways.
On A Christian Worldview of Fiction, Rebecca LuElla Miller, has been working for several days at defining Christian fiction. She’s heading toward purposefully weaving theme into a story to make a point. Now she’s not saying we should write fables and give a moral at the end of every story, but I think she’ll advocate that we need to have a purpose for writing the story and that purpose will have something to do with communicating some bit of truth to the audience.
On Novel Journey, Gina wrapped up today a two part interview with Walter Wangerin Jr. and he also has something to say about message in fiction. He says, “It is our obligation to embrace truth and to allow it to be the experience of the reader.” But he wants us to refrain from driving home a point or quizzing our readers to see if they got the message. That kind of moralizing, he thinks, vitiates the power of the story.
And in the New York Times, last week, Naomi Wolf talked about the Gossip Girl books, which were the topic of my very first post ever on this blog.
First Wolf tells us about the sex in the books–oral sex, sex with multiple partners, sex in public places–and then she says:
But teenagers, or their parents, do buy the bad-girls books the “Clique,” “Gossip Girl” and “A-List” series have all sold more than a million copies. And while the tacky sex scenes in them are annoying, they aren’t really the problem. The problem is a value system in which meanness rules, parents check out, conformity is everything and stressed-out adult values are presumed to be meaningful to teenagers. The books have a kitsch quality they package corruption with a cute overlay.
Well, I’m sure that the value system is a problem but I am floored that this woman finds tacky sex scenes annoying but not really a problem.
Alright, the Gossip Girl books are not art and they don’t pretend to be. But they are shaping children.
So how can Christians take back some ground in the culture that is so foreign to them? If I’ve read the Christian bloggers correctly today then I agree with Wangerin that we shouldn’t tack on morals or beat our readers over the head. We should write powerful stories that make our readers experience truth. I agree with Rebecca that we should write purposefully with a theme in mind. And I agree with Mark that we should write what we want but we should critique the work before we put it out on the road.
But what I think we need, and we may be missing, is a burning desire to see our agenda pushed forward. I do think that the Brokeback Mountain people wrote with influence in mind. I think the guys who are writing all the young homosexual coming out books are writing with influence in mind. I think that Katherine Paterson, as much as she denies it, is writing with influence in mind (maybe in her subconscious mind–she’s trying to influence herself as she writes, but she manages to influence everyone else while she’s at it).
I think we Christians in the US have had it too easy. We’ve not been persecuted for our beliefs. In fact it’s often hard to tell the difference between a Christian and a nonChristian these days. We have all the same things the world has. We have the cars, the houses, the electronics, all the toys. We have the divorces, we have the out-of-wedlock pregnancies. Far from wanting desperately to have the world accept us and hear our message, the church chases after the worldlings, feeling a bit put out that they get all the fun. They have rock music, we want it too, by golly. They have novels, we want our own novels. They have fortune cookies then we should have testamints and our wwjd bracelets are every bit as trendy as as anything the world has.
I agree with Mr. Wangerin, we do need to learn the craft, and up until last week I would have said that was the big problem with CBA books–poor craft. But I begin to think that that is not the real problem. I begin to think that the real problem is that we aren’t hungry enough. We aren’t hurting enough. We aren’t desperate enough. We aren’t driven to influence the world for Christ–to strengthen the church, to save the oppressed. We don’t want to press back the evil, we’re too busy dancing with it.
No I don’t think we should write preachy novels. I think we should write novels that shake our readers up. Novels that pierce hard hearts and pour balm on those who are already injured and waiting to be healed. I very much think we should write with an intent to influence.