I often feel like a failure when I look at how much others write. I’m a slow writer. I’m a slow learner. I started my first novel ten years ago and finished it a couple of years later. I thought it was decent, but I sent it to two agents and three editors and realized pretty quickly that it wasn’t very good.
I got a couple of requests for full manuscripts on it, but as I submitted, I realized that I didn’t have a good plot, for one thing. I had started with the first four chapters firmly in mind and a very vague idea of how the story would end. And when I wrote my synopsis I saw that I hadn’t set up a conflict in the beginning of the story that paid off in the end.
After that I took a couple of years off from writing, so I could read and study. I read old books, and new books, award winners and obscure books. I read good books, mostly, but a few bad books. And I read a lot of writing “how to” books and blogs. I read about plot, about conflict, about characterization. After all that reading, I came to realize that a great concept is imperative if I want to break in and be published.
Why? Because we have to snag easily distracted readers quickly and while voice will do the snagging once the reader gets to the first page, premise is what causes the reader to flip the book over, open it up, and read the first page to begin with.
Most of us read the back-cover copy before we read the book. I think that most of us should write the back-cover copy before we write the book.
If we can deliver our story in fifty words and then again in 250 words and finally in 750 words, and if in those synopses we can sell the premise, the reader will flip to the first page and there, if you have voice, you will close the sale.
I can’t start a novel now until I have my synopses written. It’s my way of testing a concept to see if it can sustain a whole book’s worth of words. Do I have characters in conflict? Will the characters grow? What is my theme and what symbols can I put in to highlight that theme? How can the secondary characters interact with the theme?
And, most importantly, can I boil the whole thing down to fifty words that are intriguing enough to make an agent/editor/reader want to continue to the two-paragraph blurb, the first page, the first chapter, and on?
Jay Asher had a high concept when he looked at suicide after the fact, through a series of tapes left by the victim. Veronica Roth has a high concept with her dystopian novel about a city where people camp on one virtue and blow it up until it become a vice. Those are high concepts, I think, because they deal with issues we are familiar with and interested in, but they are presented to us in a fresh way.
The rest of us may not be on the cutting edge. I can’t necessarily come up with high-concept plots. What I can do is come up with a solid plot where a character is in conflict and there seems to be no way out of her predicament. In the end she will find a way out because of something she learned or some strength she gained through her trials. I can take her story and express it in fifty words, and then expand that fifty words into 250 and 750-word synopses.
So here I am, eight years after I completed my fist novel, and I don’t have a drawer full of manuscripts. But I do have a better understanding about why some stories work and others don’t. And an added benefit to writing short synopses first is that they enable me to write faster, once I sit down to work on the novel. Once I have a synopsis hammered out, I know my character a little. I know why she does the things she does. I know where she’s headed and what she has to learn. Knowing these things makes it easier to write her story.
What about you? Do you write your synopses first or last? Do you have a fifty-word synopsis that gives a compelling concept before you start your novel?

I adore his books), HOLES twists the story by having the great, great. great, great, grandsons fulfill their ancestors obligations.

